Well, it seems that he was in "Tweeter mode", so here is the summary. However, I monitor the Bugtracker, and somehow it clicked last night when I saw the update on this ticket, and I urged lean_geek to come here and post the details. So, creating a new VM in the Win7 "host" and repeating the steps that lean_geek gave us, resulted in a crash at boot as well. Now my Win7 "host" doesn't have VT-x (obviously). It is the successor to Windows 95, and was released to manufacturing on May 15, 1998, and generally to retail on June 25, 1998. Host OSX, Guest Win7-32, installed VirtualBox 5.2.11 on the Win7 VM. Windows 98 is an operating system developed by Microsoft as part of its Windows 9x family of Microsoft Windows operating systems. And given that the raw-mode is losing the "fight", we thought that this was a "VT-x is not available" issue.Īnd I tried to prove it as well. The issue was dismissed as a "Host doesn't have VT-x capabilities" (I apologize lean_geek) because everything we tried (on VT-x hosts) was booting just fine. <- That last one was in a nested VM of mine, see below. 0x80000003) occurred in the application at location 0圆5c080e6.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |